Saturday, March 23, 2013

Vaccinarea - arma secreta de distrugere in masa

Cititi mai jos despre cum Bill Gates si imperiul sau planuieste sa mai depopuleze un pic planeta. Aveti si un filmulet cu propriile lui vorbe in timpul unui discurs malefic.

Friday, March 22, 2013

Prima carte in limba romana despre pericolul vaccinarilor

Dr. Christa Todea-Gross "Vaccinurile: Preventie sau boala? este prima carte in limba romana care pune la indoiala eficienta vaccinurilor si demonteaza in peste 400 de pagini cel mai mare mit al medicinei moderne. Ma mir ca a fost posibil sa se publice asa ceva in Romania, este laudabil. Oficial s-a deschis cutia Pandorei si la noi - din ce in ce mai multa lume va avea ocazia sa afle adevarul despre scopul real al vaccinarilor - imbolnavirea si reducerea populatiei globului, sau macar isi va pune anumite intrebari, ceea ce poate fi un inceput pentru o revolta in masa. 
Stiti cate carti exista in limba engleza pe aceasta tema? 108 carti. Pentru cei sceptici - oare chiar au fost scrise degeaba? Mai jos aveti un link cu lista completa.

The truth behind vaccines - Interview with an ex-vaccine worker

Jon Rappaport interviews an ex-vaccine worker "Dr Mark Randall".

Q: Do you believe that people should be allowed to choose whether they should get vaccines?
A: On a political level, yes. On a scientific level, people need information, so that they can choose well. It's one thing to say choice is good. But if the atmosphere is full of lies, how can you choose? Also, if the FDA were run by honorable people, these vaccines would not be granted licenses. They would be investigated to within an inch of their lives.

Q: Are some vaccines more dangerous than others?
A: Yes. The DPT shot, for example. The MMR. But some lots of a vaccine are more dangerous than other lots of the same vaccine. As far as I'm concerned, all vaccines are dangerous.

Q: Why?
A: Several reasons. They involve the human immune system in a process that tends to compromise immunity. They can actually cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. They can cause other diseases than the ones they are supposed to prevent.

Q: Why are we quoted statistics which seem to prove that vaccines have been tremendously successful at wiping out diseases?
A: Why? To give the illusion that these vaccines are useful. If a vaccine suppresses visible symptoms of a disease like measles, everyone assumes that the vaccine is a success. But, under the surface, the vaccine can harm the immune system itself. And if it causes other diseases -- say, meningitis -- that fact is masked, because no one believes that the vaccine can do that. The connection is overlooked.

Q: Now, you worked in labs. Where purity was an issue.
A: The public believes that these labs, these manufacturing facilities are the cleanest places in the world. That is not true. Contamination occurs all the time. You get all sorts of debris introduced into vaccines. In the Rimavex measles vaccine, we found various chicken viruses. In polio vaccine, we found acanthamoeba, which is a so-called "brain-eating" amoeba. Simian cytomegalovirus in polio vaccine. Simian foamy virus in the rotavirus vaccine. Bird-cancer viruses in the MMR vaccine. Various micro-organisms in the anthrax vaccine. I've found potentially dangerous enzyme inhibitors in several vaccines. Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses in the rubella vaccine. Avian leucosis virus in the flu vaccine. Pestivirus in the MMR vaccine.

Q: Let me get this straight. These are all contaminants which don't belong in the vaccines.
A: That's right. And if you try to calculate what damage these contaminants can cause, well, we don't really know, because no testing has been done, or very little testing. It's a game of roulette. You take your chances. Also, most people don't know that some polio vaccines, adenovirus vaccines, rubella and hep A and measles vaccines have been made with aborted human fetal tissue. I have found what I believed were bacterial fragments and poliovirus in these vaccines from time to time -- which may have come from that fetal tissue. When you look for contaminants in vaccines, you can come up with material that IS puzzling. You know it shouldn't be there, but you don't know exactly what you've got. I have found what I believed was a very small "fragment" of human hair and also human mucus. I have found what can only be called "foreign protein," which could mean almost anything. It could mean protein from viruses.

Q: And beyond the purity issue?
A: You are dealing with the basic faulty premise about vaccines. That they intricately stimulate the immune system to create the conditions for immunity from disease. That is the bad premise. It doesn't work that way. A vaccine is supposed to "create" antibodies which, indirectly, offer protection against disease. However, the immune system is much larger and more involved than antibodies and their related "killer cells."
Q: Why doesn't it make sense?
A: Because the vaccine obviously acts in the body for a long period of time after it is given. A reaction can be gradual. Deterioration can be gradual. Neurological problems can develop over time. They do in various conditions, even according to a conventional analysis. So why couldn't that be the case with vaccines? If chemical poisoning can occur gradually, why couldn't that be the case with a vaccine which contains mercury?

Q: If vaccines actually do harm, why are they given?
A: First of all, there is no "if." They do harm. It becomes a more difficult question to decide whether they do harm in those people who seem to show no harm. Then you are dealing with the kind of research which should be done, but isn't. Researchers should be probing to discover a kind of map, or flow chart, which shows exactly what vaccines do in the body from the moment they enter. This research has not been done. As to why they are given, we could sit here for two days and discuss all the reasons. As you've said many times, at different layers of the system people have their motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotion, misguided idealism, unthinking habit, and so on. But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but it's true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests. There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor. This network of people knows what is going on. They know that vaccines have been used, and are being used, to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for takeover by globalist powers. I have had the opportunity to speak with several of these people from this network.

Q: To avoid any confusion, I'd like you to review, once more, the disease problems that vaccines can cause. Which diseases, how that happens.
A: We are basically talking about two potential harmful outcomes. One, the person gets the disease from the vaccine. He gets the disease which the vaccine is supposed to protect him from. Because, some version of the disease is in the vaccine to begin with. Or two, he doesn't get THAT disease, but at some later time, maybe right away, maybe not, he develops another condition which is caused by the vaccine. That condition could be autism, what's called autism, or it could be some other disease like meningitis. He could become mentally disabled.

Q: Medical PR people, in concert with the press, scare the hell out of parents with dire scenarios about what will happen if their kids don't get shots.
A: They make it seem a crime to refuse the vaccine. They equate it with bad parenting. You fight that with better information. It is always a challenge to buck the authorities. And only you can decide whether to do it. It is every person's responsibility to make up his mind. The medical cartel likes that bet. It is betting that the fear will win.


Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Vaccinarile obligatorii - painea pediatrilor

"Existenta vaccinarilor obligatorii face ca pacienti care altfel n-ar avea nici un motiv sa se prezinte la pediatru, sa fie obligati sa vina periodic doar pentru vaccinare; astfel, vaccinarile au devenit “painea si cutitul” practicii pediatrice. De aceea, pediatrii vor continua sa apere pana la moarte conceptul de vaccinare obligatorie."


Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Mircea Badea – povestea de seara pentru adulti

In general, romanii se impart in 2 categorii: cei care se amuza copios cu Badea si cei care nu-l sufera. Ii inteleg si pe unii si pe ceilalti. E greu sa fii de acord cu el tot timpul, si uneori este intr-adevar infumurat, enervant si laudaros. Dar cine e perfect ? Facem abstractie, pentru ca stie sa creeze buna dispozitie. Omul asta e in stare sa turuie cu orele pe orice tema, dar glumele lui piperate sunt destul de inteligente. Si culmea e, ca se intampla sa gandim la fel in multe privinte. Nu stau acum sa le enumar, dar de multe ori parca imi exprima propriile ganduri. Popularitatea lui Badea evident starneste invidia multora. Ati vazut cate Like-uri poate sa adune in doar cateva minute? Este extraordinar. Emisiunea lui merge la suflet numai bine inainte de somnic.
As putea spune ca noi, cei care urmarim "In gura presei" seara de seara si ii impartasim parerile (sau de fapt el le exprima pe ale noastre) suntem un fel de generatia Mircea Badea: tineri spre varsta medie, un pic mai neconventionali, netematori de a spune adevarului pe nume si de a iesi din tipare, intotdeauna gata de a face misto de ceea ce ni se intampla in aceasta tara plina de ciudatenii, revoltati dar veseli, luptatori pana la capat. Ceea ce face Mircea Badea nu se rezuma la a prezenta presa intr-un mod mai distractiv, ci e un fel de educatie indirecta a maselor, numai ca nu are succes decat cu cei care s-au saturat sa mearga laolalta cu turma.
Il respect cel putin pentru faptul ca ar putea sa exploateze mult mai mult aceasta popularitate de care beneficiaza, dar n-o face. Putini sunt ca el.

Sunday, March 3, 2013

Cum sa-ti inveti bebelusul sa adoarma singur

O sa va povestesc ceea ce am facut eu ca sa-mi invat bebelusul sa adoarma singur, dupa 10 luni in care ne-am chinuit ingrozitor in fiecare seara. Marcus a fost certat rau cu somnul de cand s-a nascut. Adormitul era partea cea mai grea: daca nu adormea la san trebuia plimbat in brate cel putin 20 minute sau leganat pe picioare (uneori nu vroia), ca sa se trezeasca dupa vreo 10 minute si trebuia s-o iei de la capat. Orele de somn variau de la o noapte la alta, in functie de cum avea el chef. Nedormita de atata timp si epuizata am hotarat sa fac ceva in privinta asta. M-am documentat pe internet despre metodele agreate de medici si recomandate de alte mamici. Am ales "the cry it out method". Desi destul de drastica, a dat rezultate imediat.
Mai intai de toate trebuie stabilita o rutina de culcare foarte stricta, de exemplu: cina, apoi baita, schimbat hainutele, alaptat, pupici si dragalaseala de noapte buna. Eu in fiecare seara inainte de somn ii enumar toate animalele care fac nani nani, pregatindu-l psihologic pentru momentul somnului. Din rutina face parte si mersul la culcare mereu la aceeasi ora.
Asadar, in prima seara, dupa rutina descrisa mai sus, l-am pus in patut si i-am zis frumos sa se culce. Am iesit din camera. Era socat si bineinteles ca s-a pus pe bocit. A plans amarnic timp de o ora, timp in care eu am intrat la 5 minute, apoi la 10 minute, la 15 minute ca sa-i aduc aminte ca trebuie sa se culce, sa-l mangai pe capsor si sa-l pup, dar fara sa-l iau in brate. A adormit epuizat dupa o ora. A doua seara a plans jumatate de ora. Am intrat la el in camera la 7 minute, apoi la 10 minute. A treia seara a plans tot jumatate de ora. A patra seara am facut progrese vizibile, a plans numai 15 minute, nici n-a mai trebuit sa mai intru. Cu fiecare seara, timpul de plans s-a redus treptat la 10 minute, apoi la 5 minute, apoi la un fel de marait si in sfarsit dupa doua saptamani, nu a mai plans deloc. Copilul se obisnuise cu ideea ca trebuie sa se culce singur, ca nu va veni nimeni sa-l ia in brate. Uneori daca nu-i e foarte somn, mai sta in picioare, vorbeste ceva pe limba lui, dar pana la urma tot se culca. Nu intru la el decat atunci cand stiu sigur ca doarme profund, ca sa-l invelesc.
De cand bebelusul meu adoarme singur viata mea s-a schimbat in bine. Pentru ca il culc mai devreme, am timp si pentru mine, o ora-doua, de care ma bucur din plin. Partea proasta e ca se mai trezeste noaptea cam de 2-3 ori, uneori la ore imposibile. Daca nu ii este foame si nu vrea sa se culce la loc imediat, aplic aceeasi metoda, il las singur. Uneori mai scanceste dar pana la urma adoarme. Din pacate nu doarme mai mult de 9-10 ore pe noapte, dar probabil atat are el nevoie ca sa se refaca.
Somnul de pranz e inca dificil, adoarme la san sau in balansoar. Doctorii recomanda sa nu aplici metoda plansului in acelasi timp pentru somnul de seara si pentru somnul de pranz. Acum astept sa mai treaca ceva timp ca sa-l invat sa adoarma singur si la pranz.
Singurul lucru pe care il regret este ca nu am facut asta cu luni in urma, cand era mai mic. Se pare ca metoda plansului se poate aplica la bebelusii de 4-6 luni, nu mai devreme.
Stiu ca unii parinti refuza sa-si lase bebelusul sa planga. Ti se rupe inima intr-adevar, dar merita. Faptul ca plange cateva seri nu-l afecteaza atat de mult pe termen lung cat obiceiurile sale proaste de adormit. Cand adoarme singur, bebe incepe sa invete sa fie independent, sa se auto-linisteasca si sa nu se mai trezeasca atat de des. Cel putin asa spun majoritatea mamicilor care au recurs la aceasta metoda. In conluzie, happier parent, happier baby.

Pentru mai multe informatii despre metoda "the cry it out" consultati linkurile de mai jos. De aici m-am inspirat eu: